new car with aluminuim frame

Status
Not open for further replies.

gerard

Member
http://edmunds.nytimes.com/advice/specialreports/articles/100499/article.html

2005 Ford GT
Homage to Ford's Past, Glimpse of Ford's Future?
By Edmunds.com Editors
Date Posted 08-21-2003

In the spring of 2004, Ford dealers will begin receiving their allotment of 2005 Ford GTs. The allotment won't be large; in fact, many dealers will never see a GT except in photographs. Less than half will receive one unit for the entire 2005 production run, and a tiny fraction will receive two or more. Total first-year production is slated for between 1,000 and 1,500 units, which explains why most of the 3,500 Ford dealers in the U.S. will never get one in their showroom. Rumor has it that hundreds within Ford Motor Company are among the first in line to buy a GT. Right behind them are the dealership owners, many of whom have been patiently waiting for a car like the GT to fulfill their exotic-car desires — desires that could never be satisfied by a foreign nameplate like Ferrari or Porsche without bringing along unwanted political baggage.
There's no denying the new Ford GT is steeped in historic equity. A modern-day interpretation of the GT40 that dominated Le Mans in the mid- to late 1960s, the new GT is supposed to represent not only the best of Ford's past but also the promise of the company's future. Automakers often refer to vehicles like this as "halo" cars. By themselves they can't erase red ink or regain market share, but a halo car can improve a brand's awareness and lead to increased showroom traffic. Mazda's Miata is probably one of the most effective halo cars from the last decade. Ford's own Thunderbird was somewhat less successful on this front. The Thunderbird, introduced in 2002, is slated to go out of production in 2005 after three years of disappointing sales figures.
05.ford.gt.f34.500.jpg

05.ford.gt.grp.500.jpg

05.ford.gt.int.500.jpg

05.ford.gt.prf2.500.jpg

05.ford.gt.r34.500.jpg

05.ford.gt.eng.500.jpg


kinda makes me proud to be american...
(wiping tears from eyes)

-gerard

2003 1.6 SE FSI Cobalt Blue & 1968 Dodge Charger
 
What a waste of a good icon... shows you how low Ford's new design has gone... to rehash something EXACTLY as the original seems to me like clutching at straws to get some attention... very sad. The original was way cool, well fast and showed Ferrari a few things, this?!!! What a shame!

____________________________________________________________________________________
[img=left]http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/180225.jpg[/img=left]
2001 A2 TDI SE Crystal Blue with Open Sky, 6CD Symphony II, BOSE upgrade, DIS and HALF a winterpack!

iPAQ 3970 with Sat-Nav sleeve, rear cupholders, luggage net and floppy wiper!

http://www.audi-a2.co.uk/uk23.htm
 
yeah, i see your point Johann...

but condider this...

compare the new GT to the new Charger and which one would you rather drive?

the new charger is sooo much sadder than the new gt...

here is another factor...

although i love my old charger, it will never smell as "nice" and be as safe etc as a new car...

this kinda becomes important when you have a wife and kids, heh heh...

it would be nice to have a new charger that is just as fun and cool but also safer for the babies that will be riding in the back seat...

oh well, i guess i can just get a strong air freshner for my charger to mask the oil smell...

heh heh...

-gerard

2003 1.6 SE FSI Cobalt Blue & 1968 Dodge Charger
 
I understand that... BUT Ford could still have designed something retro looking with GT40 styling cues AND all the safety etc. They were too lazy to that because they knew no-one would want a Ford sportscar anyway... so they had to use an old "established brand look" if you like...

They should also have called this car the GT44 as it is in fact 4 inches taller than the original that was 40 inches tall, hence the name... :)

____________________________________________________________________________________
[img=left]http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/180225.jpg[/img=left]
2001 A2 TDI SE Crystal Blue with Open Sky, 6CD Symphony II, BOSE upgrade, DIS and HALF a winterpack!

iPAQ 3970 with Sat-Nav sleeve, rear cupholders, luggage net and floppy wiper!

http://www.audi-a2.co.uk/uk23.htm
 
oh yeah,

if you read the article, it says the design to build process took something like 10 months!

another reason not to do any new design!

still, i think it looks better than the new Charger...

but me, i am a classic car dude so i am happy to see an old looking new car...

it is going to be very successful i think...

did you read the article? they do mention how they designed it and how they came up with interesting things that you don;t see in the photos...

so there are some new things in the mix...

now the new cadilac cars are the worst looking cars i have ever seen! so i am still happy to see the GT look the way it does....

maybe that is a compromise? heh heh.... but i don't mind....

gerard

2003 1.6 SE FSI Cobalt Blue & 1968 Dodge Charger
 
[}:)] I'm just wondering what the metal-looking tubes are for on in the seats.... drainage for when you wet yourself when you realise that Ford have done it again - made a great looking car that is appauling to drive (aka Ford Cougar!)??

Sorry.. traded Cougar recently for A2 TDi Sport; whilst not quite as quick in a straight line, the A2 out-handles the Ford easily... [15][17]

[24]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top