I'm not able to answer the question in detail, others may do.I have one question .
Are the basic AUA and BBY bare engines essentially the same with the ancillaries being the difference between the two types if engines .
ie if I were to use the BBY ancillaries on tha AUA block and head .
Would the AUA become a BBY ?.
Isn't it the other way around, started as AUA, then had a BBY, (individual coil packs), fitted?I just spoke to the garage that installed the engine .
The owner brought a AUA engine complete and asked the garage to fit it .
Tha garage fitted it as requested and the engine failed to start .
So it seems the A2 has a AUA engine complete fitted with the original BBY ecu .
The car failed to start after the conversion .
What do I do now ?.
It seems the original engine was a BBY and was replaced with a AUAIsn't it the other way around, started as AUA, then had a BBY, (individual coil packs), fitted?
Mac.
Ill check what my ecu is and get back to you ..According to 7Zap:
The AUA ECU is either 036997034AB, or 036906034EH.
The BBY ECU is either 036906034CA, or 036906034FE.
Mac.
That's promising, hopefully the physical part will match.Ill check what my ecu is and get back to you ..
My ecu code from my vcd scan confirms its the 1st one on your BBY code list 036906034CA
Yes BBY to AUA .This is useful from German wiki
Unterschiede AUA BBY – A2-Freun.de Wiki
wiki.a2-freun.de
If I have understood correctly the original engine was a BBY and was replaced with a AUA. Certain parts from the original BBY were swapped on to replacement AUA. From this article there would appear to be subtle differences with the fuel rail, air box and of course a move to individual coil packs but otherwise broadly the same
J
You may have something there .Reading back through this thread, the car is a 2002 and therefore originally an early BBY. The engine in that's in the car now still has individual coil packs, but the replacement engine was an AUA from a 2001 car. So to make it run at all, they must have had to fit the BBY coil packs to it so that it still looked like a BBY to the ECU. They must have been able to do that without having to change the entire head, as the BBY head would very likely have had bent valves after the cambelt failure and the labour even to investigate would have been prohibitive. So it now has single coil packs again, but possibly not fitted the way Audi intended.
A couple of possibilities occur to me. One, might there be some difference in the output of the various sensors attached to the head and/or block between AUA and BBY, that's causing the BBY ECU to struggle to fuel it correctly? Or two, if there is any difference between them, have the correct spark plugs for an AUA rather than a BBY been used in the recent replacement? I once had a recon engine in one of my cars, and the place that supplied and fitted it used spark plugs where the nose was shorter than standard. It was OK-ish out on the road, but idled roughly.
Looking at 7Zap, there's a part called the trigger ring, which drives the crankshaft sensor. Although it is marked 14, it doesn't appear in the parts list, looks to be part of Group 13. What caught my eye, is that there are two alternatives, one of the few parts that have alternatives.That's a bit of deduction, Poirot himself would be proud of Ian.
That the engine could well be a mongrel.
Looking at 7Zap, the head, camshaft, (and crankshaft sensor), seem, to me, to be the same parts, on both AUA and BBY engines.
So it might not be such a bad combination. After all, it did start and run, albeit not very well.
I reckon to give it the benefit of the doubt for now, and concentrate on the basics, fuel, compression, and sparks.
Mac.
My guess would be yes, but it could be in the ECU itself. Can't find any details of the trigger ring though, as no part number to play with.Interesting. @Azim, whilst testing for sparks would it be possible to take a few photos. In particular the BBY cam cover has a vent that isn’t present on the AUA and the fuel rail and air box is also different. It would be useful to establish if possible what may have not been swapped. @mac That is a good find, I wonder if it is related to the fact that the AUA fires twice as often?
J
I might take the new spark plugs out and compare them with the old ones.That's a bit of deduction, Poirot himself would be proud of Ian.
That the engine could well be a mongrel.
Looking at 7Zap, the head, camshaft, (but possibly not the crankshaft sensor), seem, to me, to be the same parts, on both AUA and BBY engines.
So it might not be such a bad combination. After all, it did start and run, albeit not very well.
I reckon to give it the benefit of the doubt for now, and concentrate on the basics, fuel, compression, and sparks.
Mac.
Edited in italics
Might be able to see what's coming from the Crank Shaft sensor via the appropriate measuring block, while turning the crank by hand. (plugs out).My guess would be yes, but it could be in the ECU itself. Can't find any details of the trigger ring though, as no part number to play with.
Mac.
how about trying the BBZ which is similar in the 9N Polo - does this help at all?My guess would be yes, but it could be in the ECU itself. Can't find any details of the trigger ring though, as no part number to play with.
Mac.
Bit of a parts number swerve, but is it possible that if you get the appropriate flange / seal component that it has the appropriate magnets integrated into the seal for the sensor to detect (similar to ABS rings inside the hubs)? So you just need the one-piece seal component?My guess would be yes, but it could be in the ECU itself. Can't find any details of the trigger ring though, as no part number to play with.
Mac.