This sounds like useful real world experience Mike - what was so bad about the Hybrid? I had a Civic hybrid which I disliked - you had to brake in a 'harsh' way or the battery just become discharged.
Simon.
Well, with the e-tron, the A3 sportback version we had, you get the worst of both worlds:
the electric motor is rated at 75PS and has a measly 8kwh battery, giving a range of only around 19 miles in the real world, because it has to lug around a petrol engine. The engine meanwhile has an output of 150PS, which would be fine if it didn't have to carry the 500-ish kg of motor and battery.
So, although it's a fairly fast car (3rd fastest of the A3 lineup after the RS and S models), it's a heavy lump and isn't as nimble as it should be. The electric range is woeful and although nice and quiet in electric mode, it's hampered by the electric drive going through the conventional gearbox, so the power delivery is stepped and not a seamless rush as it is in a full electric.
Add to this that it's expensive to buy, has terrible residuals (around 40% after 3 years) and has now been killed off by Audi, so is getting worse to own, is expensive to service (as the electric stuff gets in the way of the normal service items) and you begin to see why it's so bad.
The Jaguar F-Pace we now own is half as big again, but yet weighs less than the e-tron. It's economy isn't far off either.